{"$schema":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/json-schemas/R2.22/Lobbyregister-Registereintrag-schema-R2.22.json","source":"Deutscher Bundestag, Lobbyregister für die Interessenvertretung gegenüber dem Deutschen Bundestag und der Bundesregierung","sourceUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de","sourceDate":"2026-04-17T00:22:59.445+02:00","jsonDocumentationUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/informationen-und-hilfe/open-data-1049716","registerNumber":"R002324","registerEntryDetails":{"registerEntryId":55986,"legislation":"GL2024","version":37,"detailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R002324/55986","pdfUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/4d/f5/568014/Lobbyregister-Registereintraege-Detailansicht-R002324-2025-06-30_17-05-18.pdf","validFromDate":"2025-06-30T17:05:18.000+02:00","validUntilDate":"2025-09-08T16:16:49.000+02:00","fiscalYearUpdate":{"updateMissing":false,"lastFiscalYearUpdate":"2025-06-30T17:05:18.000+02:00"}},"accountDetails":{"activeLobbyist":true,"activeDateRanges":[{"fromDate":"2024-10-01T14:29:10.000+02:00"}],"firstPublicationDate":"2022-02-28T18:08:45.000+01:00","lastUpdateDate":"2025-06-30T17:05:18.000+02:00","registerEntryVersions":[{"registerEntryId":55986,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/55986","version":37,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2025-06-30T17:05:18.000+02:00","validUntilDate":"2025-09-08T16:16:49.000+02:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":55975,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/55975","version":36,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2025-05-20T10:51:51.000+02:00","validUntilDate":"2025-06-30T17:05:18.000+02:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":54236,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/54236","version":35,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2025-05-06T15:14:41.000+02:00","validUntilDate":"2025-05-20T10:51:51.000+02:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":49298,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/49298","version":34,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2025-01-22T11:54:29.000+01:00","validUntilDate":"2025-05-06T15:14:41.000+02:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":48967,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/48967","version":33,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2025-01-09T15:46:17.000+01:00","validUntilDate":"2025-01-22T11:54:29.000+01:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":48939,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/48939","version":32,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2025-01-09T13:38:44.000+01:00","validUntilDate":"2025-01-09T15:46:17.000+01:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":47618,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/47618","version":31,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2024-12-17T15:19:31.000+01:00","validUntilDate":"2025-01-09T13:38:44.000+01:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":47582,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/47582","version":30,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2024-12-05T10:55:07.000+01:00","validUntilDate":"2024-12-17T15:19:31.000+01:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":47169,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/47169","version":29,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2024-11-27T11:46:25.000+01:00","validUntilDate":"2024-12-05T10:55:07.000+01:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true},{"registerEntryId":44823,"jsonDetailUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/sucheJson/R002324/44823","version":28,"legislation":"GL2024","validFromDate":"2024-10-01T14:29:10.000+02:00","validUntilDate":"2024-11-27T11:46:25.000+01:00","versionActiveLobbyist":true}],"accountHasCodexViolations":false},"lobbyistIdentity":{"identity":"ORGANIZATION","name":"Johanssen+Kretschmer Strategische Kommunikation GmbH","legalFormType":{"code":"JURISTIC_PERSON","de":"Juristische Person","en":"Legal person"},"legalForm":{"code":"LF_GMBH","de":"Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH)","en":"Limited liability company (GmbH)"},"contactDetails":{"phoneNumber":"+493052000570","emails":[{"email":"info@jk-kom.de"}],"websites":[{"website":"www.jk-kom.de"}]},"address":{"type":"NATIONAL","street":"Wilhelmstraße ","streetNumber":"118","zipCode":"10963","city":"Berlin","country":{"code":"DE","de":"Deutschland","en":"Germany"}},"capitalCityRepresentationPresent":false,"legalRepresentatives":[{"lastName":"Kretschmer","firstName":"Heiko","function":"Geschäftsführer","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false,"entrustedPerson":true,"contactDetails":{}},{"lastName":"Grote","firstName":"Vera","function":"Prokuristin","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false,"entrustedPerson":false,"contactDetails":{}},{"lastName":"Plath","firstName":"Thorsten","function":"Prokurist","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false,"entrustedPerson":true,"contactDetails":{}},{"lastName":"Kapinos","firstName":"Denis","function":"Prokurist","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false,"entrustedPerson":false,"contactDetails":{}}],"entrustedPersonsPresent":true,"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Kretschmer","firstName":"Heiko","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Donath","firstName":"Björn","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Gassen","firstName":"Christina","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Minderjahn","firstName":"Barbara","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Schmitz","firstName":"Florian","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Schramm","firstName":"Simon","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Sommer","firstName":"Philipp","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Voskoboynikova","firstName":"Maria","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Weiler","firstName":"Kathi","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Opitz","firstName":"Ella","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Plath","firstName":"Thorsten","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Kostadinov","firstName":"Sebastian","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":true,"recentGovernmentFunction":{"ended":true,"endDate":"2024-08","type":{"code":"HOUSE_OF_REPRESENTATIVES","de":"Bundestag","en":"House of representatives"},"houseOfRepresentatives":{"function":{"code":"FUNCTION_FOR_MEMBER","de":"Funktion für ein Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages","en":"Function for a member of the German Bundestag"},"functionPosition":"Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter"}}},{"lastName":"Mohr","firstName":"Timo","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Ulbrich","firstName":"Kirsten","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":true,"recentGovernmentFunction":{"ended":false,"type":{"code":"FEDERAL_ADMINISTRATION","de":"Bundesverwaltung","en":"Federal administration"},"federalAdministration":{"supremeFederalAuthority":"Verwaltung des Deutschen Bundestages","function":"Freiberufliche Parlamentsredakteurin"}}}],"membersPresent":false,"membershipsPresent":true,"memberships":[{"membership":"DialogGesellschaft e.V."},{"membership":"degepol e.V."},{"membership":"Wirtschaftsforum der SPD e.V."},{"membership":"Gesellschaft zum Studium strukturpolitischer Fragen e.V."},{"membership":"Europäische Bewegung Deutschland e.V."},{"membership":"BCCG e.V."},{"membership":"Social Entrepreneurship Netzwerk e.V"},{"membership":"LPRS - Leipziger Public Relations Studierende e.V."},{"membership":"PTX-Allianz"},{"membership":"Roundtable Wärmewende"}]},"activitiesAndInterests":{"activity":{"code":"ACT_CONSULTING","de":"Beratungsunternehmen, selbständige Beraterin oder selbständiger Berater","en":"Consulting company, independent consultant"},"typesOfExercisingLobbyWork":[{"code":"ON_BEHALF_OF_THIRD_PARTY","de":"Die Interessenvertretung wird im Auftrag Dritter selbst wahrgenommen","en":"Representation of interests is carried out on behalf of third parties themselves"},{"code":"CONTRACTS_OPERATED_ON_BEHALF_OF_THIRD_PARTY_BY_SUBPARTY","de":"Die Interessenvertretung wird im Auftrag Dritter durch die Beauftragung weiterer Dritter wahrgenommen","en":"Contracts are awarded to subcontractors for the representation of interests on behalf of third parties"}],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_POLLUTION","de":"Immissionsschutz","en":"Immission control"},{"code":"FOI_TRANSPORTATION_AUTOMOBILE","de":"Straßenverkehr","en":"Road traffic"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_SERVICES","de":"Handel und Dienstleistungen","en":"Trade and services"},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_CLIMATE","de":"Klimaschutz","en":"Climate protection"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_COMPETITION_LAW","de":"Wettbewerbsrecht","en":"Competition law"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Wirtschaft\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Economy\""},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_SUSTAINABILITY","de":"Nachhaltigkeit und Ressourcenschutz","en":"Sustainability and resource protection"},{"code":"FOI_FOREIGN_TRADE","de":"Außenwirtschaft","en":"Foreign trade"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_INDUSTRIAL","de":"Industriepolitik","en":"Industrial policy"},{"code":"FOI_HEALTH_MEDICINE","de":"Arzneimittel","en":"Medicine"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_OVERALL","de":"Allgemeine Energiepolitik","en":"Energy policy in general"},{"code":"FOI_TRANSPORTATION_FREIGHT_TRANSPORT","de":"Güterverkehr","en":"Freight transportation"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_DIGITALIZATION","de":"Digitalisierung","en":"Digitalization"},{"code":"FOI_EU_DOMESTIC_MARKET","de":"EU-Binnenmarkt","en":"EU internal market"},{"code":"FOI_SCIENCE_RESEARCH_TECHNOLOGY","de":"Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie","en":"Science, research and technology"},{"code":"FOI_EP_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Bildung und Erziehung\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Education and parenting\""},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Umwelt\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Environment\""},{"code":"FOI_EU_LAWS","de":"EU-Gesetzgebung","en":"EU legislation"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_PRIVACY","de":"Datenschutz und Informationssicherheit","en":"Data protection and information security"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_AUTOMOBILE","de":"Automobilwirtschaft","en":"Automotive industry"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_RENEWABLE","de":"Erneuerbare Energien","en":"Renewable energy"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_FOSSILE","de":"Fossile Energien","en":"Fossil fuels"},{"code":"FOI_TRANSPORTATION_RAIL","de":"Schienenverkehr","en":"Rail transportation"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_NET","de":"Energienetze","en":"Energy networks"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_COMMUNICATION","de":"Kommunikations- und Informationstechnik","en":"Communication and information technology"},{"code":"FOI_TRANSPORTATION_INDRASTRUCTURE","de":"Verkehrsinfrastruktur","en":"Infrastructure"}],"activityDescription":"Johanssen + Kretschmer ist ein Beratungsunternehmen für Strategische Kommunikation. \r\nWenn Issues, Themen oder Interessen einer Organisation oder eines Unternehmens von allgemeiner Bedeutung, hoher Relevanz oder großer Kritikalität sind, dann muss man davon ausgehen, dass politische Entscheidungsträger hierzu im Austausch mit vielen anderen gesellschaftlichen Stakeholdern sind (und umgekehrt). Bei diesem Prozess begleiten wir unsere Kunden strategisch und nachhaltig, das heißt: langfristig orientiert und entlang vermittelbarer Interessen. Unsere Ziele: Das Beziehungskapital, sprich den Vertrauenskredit bei den relevanten Stakeholdern systematisch zu vergrößern und so die grundlegende Positionierung zu verbessern und Deutungshoheit über die eigenen Themen und Issues zu erlangen. Dialogprozesse können dabei im Einzelfall hilfreich sein. Grundsätzlich gilt es, die Implikationen politischer, gesellschaftlicher und ökonomischer Entwicklungen auf Geschäftsmodelle jeweils aktuell zu analysieren und in der Public- und Stakeholder Affairs- Arbeit zu berücksichtigen. \r\nIm Auftrag und für unsere Kunden erarbeiten wir u.a. gemeinsam mit freien Beratern aus unserem Netzwerk PA-Strategien, analysieren das politische und gesellschaftliche Umfeld, monitoren politische Debatten und Gesetzgebungsinitiativen in Land, Bund und EU, organisieren Dialogformate zwischen Kunde und Politik, schaffen Stakeholder-Allianzen uvm."},"employeesInvolvedInLobbying":{"relatedFiscalYearFinished":true,"relatedFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","relatedFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","employeeFTE":0.33},"financialExpenses":{"relatedFiscalYearFinished":true,"relatedFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","relatedFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","financialExpensesEuro":{"from":20001,"to":30000}},"mainFundingSources":{"relatedFiscalYearFinished":true,"relatedFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","relatedFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","mainFundingSources":[{"code":"MFS_ECONOMIC_ACTIVITY","de":"Wirtschaftliche Tätigkeit","en":"Economic activity"}]},"publicAllowances":{"publicAllowancesPresent":false,"relatedFiscalYearFinished":true,"relatedFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","relatedFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31"},"donators":{"relatedFiscalYearFinished":true,"relatedFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","relatedFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","totalDonationsEuro":{"from":0,"to":0}},"membershipFees":{"relatedFiscalYearFinished":true,"relatedFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","relatedFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","totalMembershipFees":{"from":0,"to":0},"individualContributorsPresent":false,"individualContributors":[]},"annualReports":{"annualReportPreviousLastFiscalYearExists":true,"previousLastFiscalYearStart":"2023-01-01","previousLastFiscalYearEnd":"2023-12-31","annualReportPdfUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/e7/39/568013/JA-2023-LobbyRG.pdf"},"regulatoryProjects":{"regulatoryProjectsPresent":true,"regulatoryProjectsCount":10,"regulatoryProjects":[{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010579","title":"Nutzung innovativer Förderinstrumente in der Energiewende","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Konzentration der begrenzt verfügbaren staatlichen Zuschussmittel auf alternativlose Anwendungsfälle in der Wärmewende. Stemmen der Hauptlast der der Finanzierung durch staatliche Förderkredite und Bürgschaften. Anpassung der Anforderungen von Krediten an realwirtschaftliche Vorgaben. Schaffung eines nachhaltigen Finanzierungsinstrumentes außerhalb der Schuldenbremse. Aufstockung von Eigenkapital der Förderbanken. Nutzung weiterer innovativer Finanzierungsmodelle wie Beteiligungen wie Bürgerfonds vor Ort, Öffentlich-Private Kooperationsmodelle, Energiewende-Fonds und Blended-Finance Modelle.","affectedLawsPresent":false,"affectedLaws":[],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_NET","de":"Energienetze","en":"Energy networks"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_OVERALL","de":"Allgemeine Energiepolitik","en":"Energy policy in general"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_RENEWABLE","de":"Erneuerbare Energien","en":"Renewable energy"}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010580","title":"Umsetzung sektorübergreifender Planungen in der Wärmewende","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Einführung einer sektorübergreifenden Planung nach dem Least Cost Planning-Prinzip auf kommunaler Ebene. Umsetzung der kommunalen Wärmeplanung als Energieleitplanung. Fokussierung des öffentlichen Mitteleinsatzes auf sektorübergreifende Ansätze. Berücksichtigung des Umfelds und der Siedlungsstrukturen.","affectedLawsPresent":true,"affectedLaws":[{"title":"Gesetz für die Wärmeplanung und zur Dekarbonisierung der Wärmenetze","shortTitle":"WPG","url":"https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/wpg"}],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_RENEWABLE","de":"Erneuerbare Energien","en":"Renewable energy"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_OVERALL","de":"Allgemeine Energiepolitik","en":"Energy policy in general"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_NET","de":"Energienetze","en":"Energy networks"}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010581","title":"Umsetzung der Ergebnisse des Fernwärmegipfels 2023","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Umsetzung der Ergebnisse des Fernwärmegipfels durch Anpassung der WärmeLV und der AVBFernwärmeV","affectedLawsPresent":true,"affectedLaws":[{"title":"Verordnung über die Umstellung auf gewerbliche Wärmelieferung für Mietwohnraum","shortTitle":"WärmeLV","url":"https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/w_rmelv"},{"title":"Verordnung über Allgemeine Bedingungen für die Versorgung mit Fernwärme","shortTitle":"AVBFernwärmeV","url":"https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/avbfernw_rmev"}],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_NET","de":"Energienetze","en":"Energy networks"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_OVERALL","de":"Allgemeine Energiepolitik","en":"Energy policy in general"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_RENEWABLE","de":"Erneuerbare Energien","en":"Renewable energy"}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010582","title":"Stärkung des emissionsarmen Güterverkehrs im ländlichen Raum","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Die ländlichen Regionen tragen zu rund 50 Prozent zum BIP bei und sind Heimat von einem Großteil des Mittelstands. Zudem haben die Regionen gemeinsam, dass ihr Anschluss an die Verkehrsinfrastruktur im Vgl. zu urbanen Gebieten deutlich schlechter ausgeprägt ist. Ihre Anbindung an den (Güter-)Schienenverkehr ist unterrepräsentiert und stellt bei der Dekarbonisierung der Logistik einen Standortnachteil dar. Dieser Nachteil wird durch weitere Lenkungsinstrumente verstärkt. Dadurch gibt es auf dem Land einen hohen Anteil an straßengebundenem Transport mit entsprechenden Emissionen der größtenteils fossilen Antriebe. Es gilt daher gleiche Wettbewerbsbedingungen für Unternehmen im ländlichen Raum im Vergleich zu Metropolregionen herzustellen, um die Dekarbonisierung der Logistik voranzubringen.","affectedLawsPresent":false,"affectedLaws":[],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_SUSTAINABILITY","de":"Nachhaltigkeit und Ressourcenschutz","en":"Sustainability and resource protection"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Wirtschaft\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Economy\""}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010583","title":"Kreislauf von PET-Flaschen ermöglichen: Bottle-to-Bottle stärken","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Nur mit einer funktionierenden Kreislaufwirtschaft nach  dem Bottle-to-bottle Prinzip kann die Getränkewirtschaft langfristig und wirtschaftlich die europäischen Ambitionen abbilden. Ein gesicherter Erstzugriff auf die Rezyklate in Verbindung mit den Vorgaben der EU würde den Unternehmen der Getränkebranche langfristig die Erreichung von CO2-Einsparungszielen im Bereich der Verpackungen ermöglichen. Gerolsteiner setzt sich daher für die Etablierung geschlossener rPET Stoffkreisläufe im Sinne eines High Quality Recycling für Getränkeflaschen ein.","affectedLawsPresent":true,"affectedLaws":[{"title":"Gesetz über das Inverkehrbringen, die Rücknahme und die hochwertige Verwertung von Verpackungen","shortTitle":"VerpackG","url":"https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/verpackg"},{"title":"Gesetz zur Förderung der Kreislaufwirtschaft und Sicherung der umweltverträglichen Bewirtschaftung von Abfällen","shortTitle":"KrWG","url":"https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/krwg"}],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Wirtschaft\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Economy\""},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_SUSTAINABILITY","de":"Nachhaltigkeit und Ressourcenschutz","en":"Sustainability and resource protection"}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010584","title":"Verbesserung im Zugang zu Medizinalcannabis","printedMattersPresent":true,"printedMatters":[{"title":"Entwurf eines Gesetzes zum kontrollierten Umgang mit Cannabis und zur Änderung weiterer Vorschriften - (Cannabisgesetz - CanG)","printingNumber":"20/8704","issuer":"BT","documentUrl":"https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/20/087/2008704.pdf","projectUrl":"https://dip.bundestag.de/vorgang/gesetz-zum-kontrollierten-umgang-mit-cannabis-und-zur-%C3%A4nderung-weiterer/302864","leadingMinistries":[{"title":"Bundesministerium für Gesundheit","shortTitle":"BMG","electionPeriod":20,"url":"https://www.bundesgesundheitsministerium.de/"}]}],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Die Interessenvertretung von Cansativa zielt darauf ab, die rechtlichen und praktischen Rahmenbedingungen zu optimieren, um Patientinnen und Patienten einen einfacheren und sichereren Zugang zu medizinischem Cannabis für therapeutische Zwecke zu ermöglichen. Ziel ist es, die medizinische Versorgung zu verbessern und bürokratische Hürden bei der Verschreibung und Abgabe von medizinischem Cannabis abzubauen.","affectedLawsPresent":true,"affectedLaws":[{"title":"Gesetz zur Versorgung mit Cannabis zu medizinischen und medizinisch-wissenschaftlichen Zwecken","shortTitle":"MedCanG","url":"https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/medcang"},{"title":"Gesetz zum Umgang mit Konsumcannabis","shortTitle":"KCanG","url":"https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kcang"}],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_HEALTH_MEDICINE","de":"Arzneimittel","en":"Medicine"}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010585","title":"Rechtssichere Cannabisgesetzgebung in Deutschland und Europa","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Die Interessenvertretung von Cansativa zielt darauf ab, eine klare und einheitliche Rechtsgrundlage zu schaffen, die den Anbau, die Logistik und die Abgabe von Cannabis in Deutschland und im europäischen Rahmen regelt. Ziel ist es, durch transparente Regelungen den Schutz der Konsumentinnen und Konsumenten zu gewährleisten, den Schwarzmarkt einzudämmen und die öffentliche Gesundheit und Sicherheit zu stärken.","affectedLawsPresent":true,"affectedLaws":[{"title":"Gesetz zum Umgang mit Konsumcannabis","shortTitle":"KCanG","url":"https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/kcang"}],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_HEALTH_MEDICINE","de":"Arzneimittel","en":"Medicine"}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010586","title":"Anpassung der Rahmenbedingungen für Investitionen in PtX- und Wasserstoffprojekte","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Bessere finanzielle Ausstattung bestehender Instrumente zum Hochlauf grüner PtX-Produkte, insbesondere H2Global und European Hydrogen Bank (Auction as a Service)\r\nEntwicklung weiterer Maßnahmen, die insbesondere die Anreize und Finanzierungsperspektiven für die Produktion, den Transport und die Anwendung setzen.","affectedLawsPresent":false,"affectedLaws":[],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_RENEWABLE","de":"Erneuerbare Energien","en":"Renewable energy"},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_CLIMATE","de":"Klimaschutz","en":"Climate protection"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Wirtschaft\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Economy\""},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_OVERALL","de":"Allgemeine Energiepolitik","en":"Energy policy in general"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_FOSSILE","de":"Fossile Energien","en":"Fossil fuels"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_INDUSTRIAL","de":"Industriepolitik","en":"Industrial policy"},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_SUSTAINABILITY","de":"Nachhaltigkeit und Ressourcenschutz","en":"Sustainability and resource protection"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_NET","de":"Energienetze","en":"Energy networks"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_AUTOMOBILE","de":"Automobilwirtschaft","en":"Automotive industry"}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0012631","title":"Praxisnahe Ausgestaltung der EU-Verordnung zu standardessenziellen Patenten","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Einsatz für eine vereinfachte und transparente Lizenzvergabe von standardessenziellen Patenten (SEPs) durch Marktakteure, im Kontext der EU-Verordnung zu standardessenziellen Patenten , insbesondere im Bereich der Mobilfunktechnologie. Ziel ist es, den Zugang zu den benötigten Technologien zu fairen Bedingungen zu ermöglichen, und Patentinhabern und Lizenznehmern einen einheitlichen Rahmen für die Lizenzvergabe bietet. Dies bedeutet die Reduktion bürokratischer Vorgaben und den erhalt marktwirtschaftlicher Mechanismen bei Essentialitätsprüfungen und Lizenzgebühren.","affectedLawsPresent":false,"affectedLaws":[],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_FOREIGN_TRADE","de":"Außenwirtschaft","en":"Foreign trade"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_COMMUNICATION","de":"Kommunikations- und Informationstechnik","en":"Communication and information technology"},{"code":"FOI_EU_LAWS","de":"EU-Gesetzgebung","en":"EU legislation"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_COMPETITION_LAW","de":"Wettbewerbsrecht","en":"Competition law"},{"code":"FOI_SCIENCE_RESEARCH_TECHNOLOGY","de":"Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie","en":"Science, research and technology"},{"code":"FOI_EU_DOMESTIC_MARKET","de":"EU-Binnenmarkt","en":"EU internal market"}]},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0013794","title":"Keine überschießenden, nationalen Souveränitätsregeln, die zusätzliche Markthürden für non-EU Cloud-Provider einführen","printedMattersPresent":false,"printedMatters":[],"draftBillPresent":false,"description":"Die Bundesregierung soll nationale Regelungen betreffend digitale Souveränität basierend auf EUCS und den Implementing Act so gestalten, dass sie nicht im Widerspruch zur europäisch formulierten und harmonisierten Cloud Security-Vorgaben stehen und insbesondere nicht immunity requirements auf nationaler Ebene einführen, die zu einem rechtlich/faktischen Ausschluss nicht-europäischer Cloudanbieter führen könnten.","affectedLawsPresent":false,"affectedLaws":[],"fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_DIGITALIZATION","de":"Digitalisierung","en":"Digitalization"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_PRIVACY","de":"Datenschutz und Informationssicherheit","en":"Data protection and information security"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_COMMUNICATION","de":"Kommunikations- und Informationstechnik","en":"Communication and information technology"}]}]},"statements":{"statementsPresent":true,"statementsCount":1,"statements":[{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0012631","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Praxisnahe Ausgestaltung der EU-Verordnung zu standardessenziellen Patenten","pdfUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/c0/2e/399440/Stellungnahme-Gutachten-SG2501220009.pdf","pdfPageCount":6,"text":{"copyrightAcknowledgement":"Die grundlegenden Stellungnahmen und Gutachten können urheberrechtlich geschützte Werke enthalten. Eine Nutzung ist nur im urheberrechtlich zulässigen Rahmen erlaubt.","text":"Avanci\r\nUnit 20, The Hyde Building\r\nThe Park, Carrickmines\r\nDublin D18 AX61\r\nIreland\r\nEuropean Commission proposal for a regulation on standard essential patents\r\nFeedback\r\nAvanci commends the European Commission for its objective to introduce more transparency, \r\npredictability, and efficiency in the licensing of standard essential patents (SEPs). However, as a company \r\ndedicated to creating independent, market-driven and industry-led joint patent licensing programmes that \r\nwas founded on these exact principles, we believe the proposal for a regulation will fail to achieve the \r\nCommission’s objectives, is likely to complicate SEP licensing globally, and will lead to an increase in the \r\ncosts of SEP licensing to the detriment of implementers, SEP holders, SMEs, and, ultimately, consumers. \r\nAvanci is an independent global provider of patent licensing solutions, working at the intersection of \r\ndifferent industries to bring efficiency, convenience, transparency, and predictability to the licensing \r\nprocess. Avanci’s efficient, market-driven joint licensing programmes provide a straightforward, \r\npredictable, and fair option for licensing the patented technologies essential for many of the products and \r\nservices that are transforming our world.1\r\nJoint patent licensing solutions have long been recognized by regulators, including the European \r\nCommission,2 as beneficial to the market and companies across the SEP licensing spectrum, whether they \r\nare implementers, SEP holders, or both. Independently managed and operated joint patent licensing \r\nprogrammes that are not owned or controlled by any licensee or licensor, such as Avanci’s, not only offer \r\nconsiderable transaction cost savings to licensees and licensors, but in addition can forge agreement on a \r\nwidely acceptable set of licensing terms between companies from across the world and with various \r\nbusiness models and of different sizes3\r\n, providing a level playing field. Avanci’s approach to SEP licensing \r\n– independent, optional, and market-driven – has been validated by the success of its 4G Vehicle \r\nlicensing programme and by the increased interest of companies in Avanci solutions.\r\nFlexible, industry-led solutions to SEP licensing are better placed to deliver the objectives the European \r\nCommission claims to achieve with its proposal for a regulation on SEPs. However, the regulation, were it \r\n1 www.avanci.com. \r\n2 Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council and the European Economic and \r\nSocial Committee: Setting out the EU approach to Standard Essential Patents, 2017; Communication from the \r\nCommission – Guidelines on the application of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union \r\nto technology transfer agreements, 2014.\r\n3\r\nJoint patent licensing platforms can be especially beneficial to SMEs that are implementers as their licensing terms \r\nand conditions allow implementers to take licenses on the same terms and conditions irrespective of the \r\nimplementer’s size.\r\n2\r\nadopted, would lead to a significant, and unwarranted, increase of the bureaucratic burden on SEP \r\nlicensing, in turn leading to an increase of costs and delays within the system. This will likely lead to a \r\ndetrimental impact on consumers who will ultimately have to pay those increased costs (as with any other \r\nitem of a bill of materials for a given product) and content themselves with less innovative products or a \r\nlater adoption of key technologies. \r\nInstead of regulating for regulation’s sake, the co-legislators should recognise the efficiency, \r\npredictability, and transparency that independent joint patent licensing platforms bring to the market. \r\nInexplicably, the European Commission’s own Impact Assessment fails to take note of important \r\ndevelopments such as the widespread uptake of the Avanci 4G Vehicle licensing programme4 and the \r\nlaunches of the Avanci Aftermarket5 and Avanci Broadcast6 programmes. All these developments, and\r\nothers,7 point toward increasing recognition within the market that collective licensing is beneficial for \r\nSEP holders and implementers. With an appropriately conducive regulatory and policy environment, we \r\ncan expect many more such solutions to develop in the future, increasing efficiency, transparency, and \r\npredictability within the SEP licensing ecosystem, particularly for SMEs. The proposed regulation for SEPs \r\nwill not provide such an environment, and in fact, will suppress beneficial, market-led solutions.\r\nThese market realities are not taken into account by the Commission’s proposal. Indeed, the supporting \r\ndocuments8\r\nthemselves conclude that there is no evidence of wide-spread malfunctioning of SEP \r\nlicensing: participation in standardisation activities is high and the uptake of standardised technologies is \r\nhigh, whereas the volume of litigation is low and, moreover, has been decreasing.9\r\nFurthermore, some provisions of the proposed regulation are likely to hamper any further positive \r\ndevelopment of joint patent licensing solutions which are proven to provide transparency, efficiency, and \r\npredictability to the market.\r\n4 Avanci announced several licence agreements for its 4G Vehicle program after 4 August 2022, including \r\nagreements with Honda, Hyundai, Kia, Nissan, Toyota and Stellantis. Avanci has now licensed the very vast majority\r\nof all 3G/4G SEPs, held by more than 55 individual patent owners, to more than 80 auto brands and more than 120 \r\nmillion connected vehicles are covered by Avanci licences. Furthermore, Avanci is expecting to launch its 5G Vehicle \r\nprogramme soon, www.avanci.com/vehicle/5gvehicle/. \r\n5 Avanci Aftermarket was launched on 20 February 2023, www.avanci.com/vehicle/aftermarket. \r\n6 Avanci Broadcast was launched on 7 March 2023, https://www.avanci.com/broadcast/. Avanci Broadcast has \r\nattracted licensors collectively responsible for almost 75% of patent families containing declared ATSC 3.0 patents, \r\ntogether with several key product makers, including some which are both licensee and licensor in the program, and \r\nhas licensed nearly all ATSC 3.0 televisions sold to date.\r\n7 Sisvel launched a cellular IoT pool on 9 November 2022.\r\n8\r\nImpact Assessment Report, SWD (2023)124; Baron, Justus, et al.: Empirical Assessment of Potential Challenges in \r\nSEP Licensing; Baron, Justus: Essentiality Checks for Potential SEPs – A Framework for Assessing the Impact of \r\nDifferent Policy Options.\r\n9 Baron, Justus et al.: Empirical Assessment of Potential Challenges in SEP Licensing, p. 185.\r\n3\r\nWe therefore ask the co-legislators to consider that adding more bureaucracy to SEP licensing will \r\nincrease transaction costs and negatively impact implementers and consumers.\r\nThe European Commission’s stated objectives for proposing the regulation are to achieve more \r\ntransparency, predictability, and efficiency in SEP licensing. While the individual proposed procedures on \r\nthe first glance may seem to achieve these objectives, they are more likely to achieve the opposite while \r\nat the same time making SEP licensing more burdensome and ultimately more costly.\r\nEssentiality check system\r\nAvanci can speak on this topic with authority, since patent pools and licensing platforms already conduct \r\nessentiality checks in accordance with existing guidelines. Since its founding in 2016, Avanci, for example,\r\nhas conducted thousands of essentiality checks for its 4G Vehicle programme through its network of \r\nindependent third-party experts based on a methodology that is trusted and accepted by several dozens \r\nof companies from across the SEP licensing spectrum. \r\nThe Commission proposes that a register and comprehensive essentiality checks on declared SEPs will \r\nbring more transparency to SEP licensing. We agree that essentiality is an important aspect to consider \r\nwhen licensing patents pertaining to industry standards, and from this it follows that more knowledge \r\nabout the results of essentiality checks can lead to better informed decisions. For example, the foreseen \r\nsystem of essentiality checks would confer some level of transparency to which patents are potentially \r\nincluded in a licence and which licensors truly own SEPs. But the benefits of mandatory essentiality\r\nchecks need to be balanced against their limitations and potential costs before a fundamental change and \r\nsubstantial new burden is introduced into SEP licensing.\r\nThe limitations of essentiality checks are readily apparent. Essentiality is only one among many factors \r\nwhen considering appropriate terms for a SEP licence. An essentiality check by itself does not indicate the \r\nvalidity of a patent and is not determinative of the value of the claimed invention. Moreover, in the case \r\nof large portfolios of hundreds or thousands or even tens of thousands of patents, the exact number and \r\nidentity of the essential patents become much less relevant to real-world, commercial negotiations of \r\nvalue. Establishing “essentiality rates” alone, without regard to additional indications of SEP portfolio \r\nvalue, will not lead to more efficiency in SEP licensing. And without coercing a high level of participation \r\nfrom the SEP owners, the possibility to produce reliable and quality results is remote.\r\nWhile the benefits are limited and speculative, the considerable cost and effort required to implement the \r\nenvisioned essentiality check system are substantial and certain. First, as a company that has evaluated \r\nthousands of SEPs, we can attest to the expense associated with high quality and defensible evaluations.\r\n4\r\nAnd those costs are far exceeded by the additional expense of preparing and submitting claim charts that \r\ndemonstrate essentiality for evaluation. Inevitably, these costs would eventually impact consumers, either\r\nthrough higher prices, less innovative products and services, or both. This additional encumbrance may \r\nalso lead patent holders to prioritize patenting their inventions in other jurisdictions with less burdensome \r\nrequirements. Second, like any test to measure SEP ownership, the behaviour of market participants will \r\nadapt to show the best results possible. This will lead to inefficient business practices optimised to show a \r\nhigh number of essential patents rather than producing high value innovations that drive technology and \r\nproducts forward.\r\nAggregate royalty determination\r\nThe determination of an aggregate royalty, defined by the proposal as the “maximum amount of royalty \r\nfor all patents essential to a standard” (article 2, no. 10), may at first glance seem to bring the \r\npredictability implementers require. However, the proposal for a regulation lacks further information on \r\nthe methodologies that may be used by the appointed “experts” to determine a maximum royalty rate.\r\nNor does it contain safeguards to ensure compliance with competition law.\r\nDetermining aggregate royalty rates for a standardized set of technologies and a particular application \r\n(i.e., type of product or service) of those technologies is complex, and best left to free-market forces.\r\nSetting an aggregate too high may impede the uptake of the technology whereas setting an aggregate too \r\nlow may inhibit future investment in research and development and standardisation activities.\r\nFurthermore, the value of a technology can increase over time as more and more products, use cases, \r\napplications, features, and services are developed and implemented. The value of cellular connectivity, for \r\nexample, is different when it is implemented in different types of products, for example in a smart meter \r\nversus a connected vehicle versus a smartphone. Furthermore, over time, additional use cases develop, \r\nenabling companies and consumers to derive more value from the technology. This is evident in the \r\nautomotive industry where auto makers who initially implemented cellular connectivity in vehicles for \r\nemergency calling are today implementing cellular connectivity in vehicles for a myriad of use cases \r\nincluding, for example, road safety and accident avoidance, remote driving, data generation collection, \r\nover-the-air updates, in-vehicle commerce and infotainment, cyber security, smart charging, and more. In \r\nshort, there is generally no “one size fits all” aggregate rate as defined by the regulatory proposal for a \r\nparticular standardised technology that will be suitable in all cases or for all time.\r\nAny aggregate royalty determination as envisioned by the proposal for a regulation would therefore need \r\nto be monitored and adjusted continuously to ensure that “any maximum amount of royalty” is tailored \r\nfor each type of product that implements the standard, based on the prevailing use cases, throughout the \r\n5\r\nlife of the standard in question, which can span a decade or two.10 Further, this does not even take into \r\nconsideration other licensing terms (that can impact the rate and vice-versa) which need to be tailored \r\nappropriately to any given market situation. Inherently, government regulation is not well suited to \r\naddress market dynamics in such a way.\r\nAvanci’s role as an independent market mediator enables it to engage freely with companies from across \r\nthe SEP licensing spectrum, gauging different (and often differing) priorities and views on various terms \r\nand conditions of a future Avanci licensing programme, tailored to a specific licensing scenario. An Avanci \r\nlicence is a standard form agreement comprising a set of terms and conditions that represent a balanced \r\noutput from those diverse views – an output that, in Avanci’s independent judgment, can be widely \r\naccepted by SEP holders and product manufacturers alike. As an independent intermediary, Avanci has an \r\ninherent interest to develop a set of terms that is attractive enough to SEP holders so they would agree \r\nto authorize Avanci to license their SEPs and, at the same time, attractive enough to product \r\nmanufacturers so they would agree to take an Avanci licence. The result of this process is an efficient, \r\ntransparent, and predictable licensing option on terms that are fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory\r\nthat is adopted in the market, as proven by the Avanci 4G Vehicle programme.\r\n11 A government-imposed \r\nprocess for setting aggregate rates would result in confusion and delay, interfering with and potentially \r\nundermining the pro-competitive benefits that collective licensing platforms bring to the market. \r\nAccordingly, this aspect of the proposed regulations would not only be costly and ineffective, but actually \r\ndetrimental.\r\nDisclosure requirements for patent pools\r\nThe proposal for a regulation would place extensive disclosure requirements on patent pools that go far \r\nbeyond what is currently required or needed to support smooth SEP licensing. While some of the \r\ninformation to be provided by patent pools is already habitually published as part of describing the \r\nlicensing offer, some other disclosure requirements are excessive and will not provide any additional \r\ntransparency, efficiency, or predictability for SEP licensing. Direct consultation with patent pools on these \r\nrequirements is respectfully requested before any regulation is enacted.12 A few examples are highlighted \r\nbelow.\r\n10 3G is still in use today, nearly two decades after it was first introduced. In fact, companies still declare new \r\nstandard essential patent to 3G today, see ETSI IPR Online Database, http://ipr.etsi.org.\r\n11 It is worth highlighting that the majority of auto OEMs to sign an Avanci 4G Vehicle licence agreement, and \r\nnotably the first ten, decided to do so without having faced any cellular SEP infringement litigation.\r\n12 While DG GROW’s “Public Consultation on a new framework for standard-essential patents” (closing date 9 May \r\n2022) did address disclosure requirements proposed, according to the Impact Assessment, broad agreement existed \r\nbetween respondent to the aforementioned consultation only on the following information: ”standards subject to \r\n6\r\n• Some patent pools are owned by publicly traded companies so disclosing the shareholder or \r\nownership structure (as proposed in article 9 (b)) will be either difficult or impossible. Moreover, \r\nsuch a requirement will not provide useful information. If the goal is to enable companies from \r\nacross the SEP licensing spectrum to assess whether the operator of a particular patent pool can \r\nobjectively exercise independent judgment (as opposed to being controlled by and potentially \r\nserving the interests of certain licensors or licensees in the pool), the proposal for a regulation \r\nneed only require disclosure of shareholders or owners who are simultaneously licensors or \r\nlicensees – and even then, in practice this tends to be common knowledge throughout the \r\nindustry.\r\n13 This would lessen the bureaucratic burden and achieve the objectives in a simpler way.\r\n• Publishing a roster of evaluators residing in the European Union (article 9 (d)) may be counter\u0002productive to smooth SEP licensing. Avanci, for example, keeps the identity of its independent \r\nthird-party evaluators confidential in order to maintain their independence from potential undue \r\ninfluence by patent owners. In fact, the proposal for a regulation itself recognises the merit of \r\nconfidentiality for evaluators. Avanci’s system for essentiality evaluations has been widely \r\naccepted and is trusted by several dozen companies from around the world. Requiring changes \r\nwithout actual need may undermine that trust and lead to a deterioration of the quality of such \r\nsystems.\r\n• In most cases, requiring a list of all SEPs being licensed (article 9 (e)) would be futile because – by \r\nthe European Commission’s own admission – it is impossible to evaluate every patent due to the \r\nnumber of patents and jurisdictions involved. Such a requirement would chill the formation of \r\npatent pools when they are needed most. Moreover, such a requirement is unnecessary when a \r\ncollective licensing platform licenses, by definition, all of the SEPs held by the participating \r\nlicensors. In such a case, an implementer knows that it will never face an SEP assertion (for the \r\nrelevant standard and products) by any of the participating licensors and, accordingly, the most \r\nrelevant information to implementers is the list of participating licensors.\r\npool licensing” (100%), “product royalties per programme” (94%) and “list of SEP owners” (87%)” (see Impact \r\nAssessment, p. 65).\r\n13 For example, it is widely known that Via Alliance is a majority-owned subsidiary of Dolby and that Access \r\nAdvance is owned by a small group of companies that are licensors in the Access Advance patent pools."},"recipientGroups":[{"recipients":{"parliament":[{"code":"RG_BT_MEMBERS_OF_PARLIAMENT","de":"Mitglieder des Bundestages","en":"Members of parliament"}],"federalGovernment":[]},"sendingDate":"2025-01-16"}]}]},"contracts":{"contractsPresent":true,"contractsCount":9,"contracts":[{"description":"Die Unterstützung der Interessenvertretung von Cansativa zielt darauf ab, die rechtlichen und praktischen Rahmenbedingungen zu optimieren, um Patientinnen und Patienten einen einfacheren und sichereren Zugang zu medizinischem Cannabis für therapeutische Zwecke zu ermöglichen. Ziel ist es, die medizinische Versorgung zu verbessern und bürokratische Hürden bei der Verschreibung und Abgabe von medizinischem Cannabis abzubauen.\r\nDie Unterstützung der Interessenvertretung von Cansativa zielt darauf ab, eine klare und einheitliche Rechtsgrundlage zu schaffen, die den Anbau, die Logistik und die Abgabe von Cannabis in Deutschland und im europäischen Rahmen regelt. Ziel ist es, durch transparente Regelungen den Schutz der Konsumentinnen und Konsumenten zu gewährleisten, den Schwarzmarkt einzudämmen und die öffentliche Gesundheit und Sicherheit zu stärken.\r\n","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_HEALTH_MEDICINE","de":"Arzneimittel","en":"Medicine"}],"regulatoryProjects":[{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010584","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Verbesserung im Zugang zu Medizinalcannabis"},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010585","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Rechtssichere Cannabisgesetzgebung in Deutschland und Europa"}],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Cansativa","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R002380","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":1,"to":50000}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Plath","firstName":"Thorsten","function":"Prokurist","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Voskoboynikova","firstName":"Maria","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}],"contractorOrganizations":[],"contractorPersons":[]}},{"description":"Die ländl. Regionen tragen zu rund 50 Prozent zum BIP bei und sind Heimat von einem Großteil des Mittelstands. Die Regionen haben gemeinsam, dass ihr Anschluss an die Verkehrsinfrastruktur im Vgl. zu urbanen Gebieten deutlich schlechter ausgeprägt ist. Ihre Anbindung an den (Güter-)Schienenverkehr ist unterrepräsentiert und stellt bei der Dekarbonisierung der Logistik einen Standortnachteil dar. Dieser Nachteil wird durch weitere Lenkungsinstrumente verstärkt. Dadurch gibt es auf dem Land einen hohen Anteil an straßengebundenem Transport mit entsprechenden Emissionen der größtenteils fossilen Antriebe. Es gilt daher gleiche Wettbewerbsbedingungen für Unternehmen im ländlichen Raum im Vergleich zu Metropolregionen herzustellen, um die Dekarbonisierung der Logistik voranzubringen.","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_SUSTAINABILITY","de":"Nachhaltigkeit und Ressourcenschutz","en":"Sustainability and resource protection"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Wirtschaft\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Economy\""}],"regulatoryProjects":[{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010582","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Stärkung des emissionsarmen Güterverkehrs im ländlichen Raum"},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010583","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Kreislauf von PET-Flaschen ermöglichen: Bottle-to-Bottle stärken"}],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Gerolsteiner Brunnen","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R005084","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":1,"to":50000}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Gassen","firstName":"Christina","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Schramm","firstName":"Simon","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}],"contractorOrganizations":[],"contractorPersons":[]}},{"description":"Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) engagiert sich im Dialog mit Entscheidungsträgern für bessere wirtschaftliche Rahmenbedingungen in seinen Geschäftsfeldern. Hierbei geht es vor allem um die Förderung innovationsfreundlicher Rahmenbedingungen in den Bereichen Cloud, IT-Infrastruktur, Software und künstliche Intelligenz. Ziel ist es, die Entwicklung und den Einsatz moderner Informationstechnologien sowohl im geschäftlichen als auch im privaten Umfeld zu stärken. ","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_SCIENCE_RESEARCH_TECHNOLOGY","de":"Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie","en":"Science, research and technology"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_DIGITALIZATION","de":"Digitalisierung","en":"Digitalization"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_INDUSTRIAL","de":"Industriepolitik","en":"Industrial policy"}],"regulatoryProjects":[],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Hewlett-Packard GmbH ","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R004057","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":1,"to":50000}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Mohr","firstName":"Timo","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Ulbrich","firstName":"Kirsten","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":true,"recentGovernmentFunction":{"ended":false,"type":{"code":"FEDERAL_ADMINISTRATION","de":"Bundesverwaltung","en":"Federal administration"},"federalAdministration":{"supremeFederalAuthority":"Verwaltung des Deutschen Bundestages","function":"Freiberufliche Parlamentsredakteurin"}}},{"lastName":"Kostadinov","firstName":"Sebastian","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":true,"recentGovernmentFunction":{"ended":true,"endDate":"2024-08","type":{"code":"HOUSE_OF_REPRESENTATIVES","de":"Bundestag","en":"House of representatives"},"houseOfRepresentatives":{"function":{"code":"FUNCTION_FOR_MEMBER","de":"Funktion für ein Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages","en":"Function for a member of the German Bundestag"},"functionPosition":"Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter"}}}],"contractorOrganizations":[],"contractorPersons":[]}},{"description":"Ziel der Interessenvertretung ist die Erläuterung von Änderungsnotwendigkeiten hinsichtlich der Erreichung der vollständigen Dekarbonisierung der Wärmeversorgung bis 2045, der koordinierten und effizienten Zusammenarbeit aller relevanten Akteure, der Ausarbeitung einer klaren sektorübergriefenden Dekarbonisierungstrategie, der Durchführung von finanziell für alle Bevölkerungsschichten und den Staat tragbaren Maßnahmen, der Fokus auf sektorübergreifende Lösungen der Wärmewende, die Umsetzung der goldenen Regel der Wärmewende: „Wärmenetze wo möglich, Einzelhauslösungen wo nötig“ sowie der Nutzung von neuen, innovativen Förderinstrumenten. Die Interessenvertretung erfolgt dabei hauptsächlich durch die Distribution und Vorstellung von Informationsmaterialen (Bspw. Policy-Paper) an Mitglieder des Bundestages und die Bundesregierung, welche durch die Mitglieder und dem Beratungsunternehmen Johanssen+Kretschmer Strategische Kommunikation erstellt wurden.","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_NET","de":"Energienetze","en":"Energy networks"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_FOSSILE","de":"Fossile Energien","en":"Fossil fuels"},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_CLIMATE","de":"Klimaschutz","en":"Climate protection"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_OVERALL","de":"Allgemeine Energiepolitik","en":"Energy policy in general"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_RENEWABLE","de":"Erneuerbare Energien","en":"Renewable energy"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Wirtschaft\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Economy\""}],"regulatoryProjects":[{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010579","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Nutzung innovativer Förderinstrumente in der Energiewende"},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010580","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Umsetzung sektorübergreifender Planungen in der Wärmewende"},{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010581","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Umsetzung der Ergebnisse des Fernwärmegipfels 2023"}],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Roundtable Wärmewende","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R006653","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":1,"to":50000}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Kretschmer","firstName":"Heiko","function":"Geschäftsführer","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Donath","firstName":"Björn","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Schramm","firstName":"Simon","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}],"contractorOrganizations":[],"contractorPersons":[]}},{"description":"Ziel der Interessenvertretung ist die Erläuterung von Änderungsnotwendigkeiten hinsichtlich der Entwicklung eines funktionierenden Marktes für PtX-Technologien von Produktion bis Anwendung in allen Sektoren sowie dem ganzheitlichen Gelingen einer integrierten Energiewende im Zusammenspiel von PtX-Technologien mit anderen Klimaschutztechnologien- und Anwendungen (Sektorenkopplung).\r\nDie Interessensvertretung erfolgt dabei hauptsächlich durch die Erstellung von Impuls- und Positionspapieren, der Durchführung von und Teilnahme an Diskussionsveranstaltungen sowie dem direkten Austausch mit Vertreterinnen und Vertretern des Deutschen Bundestags und der Bundesregierung.","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_POLLUTION","de":"Immissionsschutz","en":"Immission control"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_INDUSTRIAL","de":"Industriepolitik","en":"Industrial policy"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_RENEWABLE","de":"Erneuerbare Energien","en":"Renewable energy"},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_CLIMATE","de":"Klimaschutz","en":"Climate protection"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Wirtschaft\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Economy\""},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Umwelt\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Environment\""},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_OVERALL","de":"Allgemeine Energiepolitik","en":"Energy policy in general"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_NET","de":"Energienetze","en":"Energy networks"},{"code":"FOI_ENERGY_FOSSILE","de":"Fossile Energien","en":"Fossil fuels"}],"regulatoryProjects":[{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0010586","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Anpassung der Rahmenbedingungen für Investitionen in PtX- und Wasserstoffprojekte"}],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Power to X Allianz (PtX Allianz)","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R002202","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":150001,"to":200000}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Kretschmer","firstName":"Heiko","function":"Geschäftsführer","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Weiler","firstName":"Kathi","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Minderjahn","firstName":"Barbara","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Donath","firstName":"Björn","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Sommer","firstName":"Philipp","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Schmitz","firstName":"Florian","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}],"contractorOrganizations":[{"name":"BRight Advisors GmbH","legalFormType":{"code":"JURISTIC_PERSON","de":"Juristische Person","en":"Legal person"},"legalForm":{"code":"LF_GMBH","de":"Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH)","en":"Limited liability company (GmbH)"},"contactDetails":{"phoneNumber":"+49305200057801","emails":[{"email":"maria.rieb@bright-advisors.de"}],"websites":[{"website":"https://brightadvisors.net/"}]},"address":{"type":"NATIONAL","street":"Wilhelmstraße ","streetNumber":"118","zipCode":"10963","city":"Berlin","country":{"code":"DE","de":"Deutschland","en":"Germany"}},"capitalCityRepresentationPresent":false,"legalRepresentatives":[{"lastName":"Bovi","firstName":"Timo","function":"Geschäftsführer","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Rieb","firstName":"Maria","function":"Geschäftsführerin","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}],"assignedPersonsPresent":true,"assignedPersons":[{"lastName":"Bovi","firstName":"Timo","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}]}],"contractorPersons":[]}},{"description":"Triple P stärkt Kinder in ihrer Resilienz und wirkt verhaltensbezogenen und emotionalen Problemen von Kindern entgegen, indem es die elterliche Beziehungs- und Erziehungskompetenz fördert. Vor diesem Hintergrund setzt sich Triple P im Dialog mit politischen Entscheidungsträgern für die nachhaltige Sicherung und Verbesserung der Rahmenbedingungen für evidenzbasierte Programme zur Unterstützung bei der Erziehung ein. ","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_EP_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Bildung und Erziehung\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Education and parenting\""}],"regulatoryProjects":[],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Triple P Deutschland","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R006536","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":1,"to":50000}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Ulbrich","firstName":"Kirsten","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":true,"recentGovernmentFunction":{"ended":false,"type":{"code":"FEDERAL_ADMINISTRATION","de":"Bundesverwaltung","en":"Federal administration"},"federalAdministration":{"supremeFederalAuthority":"Verwaltung des Deutschen Bundestages","function":"Freiberufliche Parlamentsredakteurin"}}},{"lastName":"Gassen","firstName":"Christina","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}],"contractorOrganizations":[],"contractorPersons":[]}},{"description":"Avanci setzt sich dafür ein, effiziente und innovative Lizensierungslösungen zu finden, die Industriesektoren überspannen und schlussendlich den Verbrauchern zu Gute kommen. ","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_EU_LAWS","de":"EU-Gesetzgebung","en":"EU legislation"},{"code":"FOI_SCIENCE_RESEARCH_TECHNOLOGY","de":"Wissenschaft, Forschung und Technologie","en":"Science, research and technology"},{"code":"FOI_EU_DOMESTIC_MARKET","de":"EU-Binnenmarkt","en":"EU internal market"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_COMMUNICATION","de":"Kommunikations- und Informationstechnik","en":"Communication and information technology"},{"code":"FOI_ECONOMY_COMPETITION_LAW","de":"Wettbewerbsrecht","en":"Competition law"},{"code":"FOI_FOREIGN_TRADE","de":"Außenwirtschaft","en":"Foreign trade"}],"regulatoryProjects":[{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0012631","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Praxisnahe Ausgestaltung der EU-Verordnung zu standardessenziellen Patenten"}],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Avanci Vehicle International Limited","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R007019","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":1,"to":50000}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Ulbrich","firstName":"Kirsten","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":true,"recentGovernmentFunction":{"ended":false,"type":{"code":"FEDERAL_ADMINISTRATION","de":"Bundesverwaltung","en":"Federal administration"},"federalAdministration":{"supremeFederalAuthority":"Verwaltung des Deutschen Bundestages","function":"Freiberufliche Parlamentsredakteurin"}}},{"lastName":"Kostadinov","firstName":"Sebastian","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":true,"recentGovernmentFunction":{"ended":true,"endDate":"2024-08","type":{"code":"HOUSE_OF_REPRESENTATIVES","de":"Bundestag","en":"House of representatives"},"houseOfRepresentatives":{"function":{"code":"FUNCTION_FOR_MEMBER","de":"Funktion für ein Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages","en":"Function for a member of the German Bundestag"},"functionPosition":"Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter"}}},{"lastName":"Sommer","firstName":"Philipp","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}],"contractorOrganizations":[],"contractorPersons":[{"referenceName":"Philippe Lorenz","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R005978"}]}},{"description":"Wir unterstützen unseren Mandanten dabei, sich strategisch und kommunikativ gegenüber relevanten Stakeholdern innerhalb der Bundesregierung und gegenüber Bundestagsabgeordneten, insbesondere im Kontext der Deutschen Verwaltungscloud (DVC), der Multi-Cloud-Strategie sowie der Deutschen Verwaltungscloud-Strategie zu positionieren. Dies umfasst z.T. auch die spezifischen Anforderungen und Schutzziele (z.B. im Bereich digitale Souveränität, Informationssicherheit, Geheim- und Datenschutz sowie an IT-Betrieb und -Infrastruktur). Dazu zählt auch die Unterstützung bei der Anbahnung sowie inhaltlichen Vorbereitung von Gesprächen im politischen Raum.","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_PRIVACY","de":"Datenschutz und Informationssicherheit","en":"Data protection and information security"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_COMMUNICATION","de":"Kommunikations- und Informationstechnik","en":"Communication and information technology"},{"code":"FOI_MEDIA_DIGITALIZATION","de":"Digitalisierung","en":"Digitalization"}],"regulatoryProjects":[{"regulatoryProjectNumber":"RV0013794","regulatoryProjectTitle":"Keine überschießenden, nationalen Souveränitätsregeln, die zusätzliche Markthürden für non-EU Cloud-Provider einführen"}],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Google Germany GmbH","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R001794","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":0,"to":0}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Kretschmer","firstName":"Heiko","function":"Geschäftsführer","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Mohr","firstName":"Timo","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Kostadinov","firstName":"Sebastian","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":true,"recentGovernmentFunction":{"ended":true,"endDate":"2024-08","type":{"code":"HOUSE_OF_REPRESENTATIVES","de":"Bundestag","en":"House of representatives"},"houseOfRepresentatives":{"function":{"code":"FUNCTION_FOR_MEMBER","de":"Funktion für ein Mitglied des Deutschen Bundestages","en":"Function for a member of the German Bundestag"},"functionPosition":"Wissenschaftlicher Mitarbeiter"}}}],"contractorOrganizations":[],"contractorPersons":[]}},{"description":"AAP versteht sich auch als europäische Tierschutzorganisation, die sich für das Wohlergehen von exotischen Säugetieren einsetzt. Die Unterstützung der Interessenvertretung von AAP zielt darauf ab, die vorhandenen Tierschutzgesetze zu verbessern und klare rechtliche Rahmenbedingungen für den Handel und privaten Besitz insbesondere von wilden Tieren zu schaffen. Die Interessensvertretung erfolgt dabei hauptsächlich durch die Erstellung von Positionspapieren und weiteren Informationsmaterialien, der Durchführung von und Teilnahme an Diskussionsveranstaltungen sowie dem direkten Austausch mit Vertreterinnen und Vertretern des Deutschen Bundestags und der Bundesregierung.","fieldsOfInterest":[{"code":"FOI_EU_LAWS","de":"EU-Gesetzgebung","en":"EU legislation"},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_OTHER","de":"Sonstiges im Bereich \"Umwelt\"","en":"Other in the field of \"Environment\""},{"code":"FOI_ENVIRONMENT_SUSTAINABILITY","de":"Nachhaltigkeit und Ressourcenschutz","en":"Sustainability and resource protection"}],"regulatoryProjects":[],"clients":{"clientOrganizations":[{"referenceName":"Stichting AAP","referenceDetailsPageUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/suche/R004481","financialResourcesReceived":{"lastFiscalYearFinished":true,"lastFiscalYearStart":"2024-01-01","lastFiscalYearEnd":"2024-12-31","from":0,"to":0}}],"clientPersons":[]},"contractors":{"entrustedPersons":[{"lastName":"Opitz","firstName":"Ella","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false},{"lastName":"Voskoboynikova","firstName":"Maria","recentGovernmentFunctionPresent":false}],"contractorOrganizations":[],"contractorPersons":[]}}]},"codeOfConduct":{"ownCodeOfConduct":true,"codeOfConductPdfUrl":"https://www.lobbyregister.bundestag.de/media/03/c9/568012/JK-code-of-business_2023.pdf"}}